Search This Blog

Showing posts with label NATO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NATO. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 3, 2025

Evolving International Relationships of India since the 1980's

Introduction

In this article, we will look at International Relationships across the world from the 1980s to date, with specific focus on the diplomatic policies of India across the world and their development.

Since the 1980s, the global geopolitical landscape has undergone significant changes, marked by the rise of China and the rapid transformation of Asia. These changes have brought about complex international relationships between Western countries, Europe, China, and Asia.

The 1980s: The Cold War Era Continues

The 1980s were marked by the continuation of the Cold War and the heightened tensions between the United States and the erstwhile Soviet Union (USSR). This period saw the proliferation of nuclear weapons, regional conflicts, and proxy wars between the two superpowers. The Western countries, Europe, and most of Asia remained firmly aligned with the United States, while India and China maintained a policy of non-alignment.

In 1989, the fall of the Berlin Wall marked the end of the Cold War and the beginning of a new era in global politics. This event paved the way for closer relations between Western countries and Europe on the one hand, and Asia on the other.

The 1990s: The Rise of Asia

The 1990s saw the emergence of Asia as a major economic powerhouse, with the rapid growth of Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore. China also began to open up its economy to foreign investment, leading to significant economic growth, while India’s economic liberalisation of 1991 helped to create an economy that was market and service oriented and expanded the role for private and foreign investment.

This period also saw the establishment of closer relationships between Western countries, Europe, and Asia. The United States, in particular, sought to deepen its ties with Asia, as evidenced by the Clinton administration's "pivot to Asia" policy.

The 2000s: China's Rise and the War on Terror

The 2000s saw the rise of China as a global economic and military power. This period was marked by China's entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, which paved the way for its integration into the global economy. It also saw the United States launch the War on Terror in response to the September 11, 2001 attacks. This led to closer cooperation between Western countries, Europe, and Asia in the fight against terrorism.

The 2010s: Shifts in Global Power

The 2010s saw significant shifts in global power, with China emerging as a major competitor to the United States. The Obama administration continued the Clinton administration’s "pivot to Asia" policy, which helped deepen the United States' engagement with Asia. At the same time, the European Union started to face significant challenges, including debt crisis and the refugee crisis. This led to increased tensions between Western countries and Europe, particularly over issues such as immigration and economic policy.

The 2020s: The COVID-19 Pandemic and Growing Tensions

The COVID-19 pandemic, which began in 2019, has had a significant impact on international relationships between Western countries, Europe, China, and Asia. The pandemic has highlighted the interdependence of the global economy and the need for closer cooperation between nations. However, the pandemic has also led to growing tensions between the United States and China, particularly over issues such as trade, intellectual property, and human rights. This has led to increased competition between the two countries, which could have significant implications for the future of global politics.

It remains to be seen how these relationships will evolve in the coming years. The United States under the Biden administration has signalled a shift towards greater cooperation and engagement with other nations, particularly in the areas of climate change and global health. However, the ongoing tensions with China and the challenges facing Europe due to the ongoing Russia–Ukraine conflict which could complicate these efforts.

As of today, the future of international relationships between Western countries, Europe, China, and Asia will depend on a complex mix of economic, political, and social factors. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, it is more important than ever for nations to work together to address common challenges and pursue shared goals.

India has been an important player in international diplomacy for several decades. In the period between 1995 to 2021, and has developed strong diplomatic relationships with several countries across the world, including China, Europe, USA, and also the economically weak nations.

India's Diplomatic Policy towards China

India and China share a complex relationship that has been marked by several historical and territorial disputes. Despite this, India has pursued a policy of engagement and cooperation with China. In the period between 1995 to 2021, India and China engaged in several high-level diplomatic talks, including the 2003 landmark agreement on the "Political Parameters and Guiding Principles for Settlement of the India-China Boundary Question." This agreement laid the foundation for resolving the border dispute between the two countries. However, tensions between India and China flared up in 2020 following a border clash in the Galwan Valley. This has led to a significant deterioration in the relationship between the two countries, with India adopting a more assertive stance towards China, while attempting to keep the relationship isolated from frequent open conflict, while conducting a series of diplomatic initiatives at the border level, as well as at international levels.

India's Diplomatic Policy towards Europe and the U.K.

In the period between 1995 to 2021, India and Europe engaged in several high-level diplomatic talks, including the 2004 India-EU Summit. This summit led to the adoption of the "Joint Action Plan" which aimed to deepen the relationship between India and the EU in areas such as trade, investment, and science and technology.

India has also pursued a policy of engagement with the United Kingdom, with both countries establishing a strategic partnership in 2004. In 2021, India and the U.K. signed the "Roadmap 2030," agreement which set out a comprehensive plan for deepening the bilateral relationship between the two countries in areas such as trade, defense, and technology.

India's Diplomatic Policy towards the United States

India and the United States have developed a strong strategic partnership over the past two decades. This partnership has been marked by closer cooperation in areas such as defence, trade, and energy.

In the period between 1995 to 2021, India and the United States engaged in several high-level diplomatic talks, including the 2000 "New Framework for the US-India Défense Relationship" and the 2005 "US-India Civil Nuclear Agreement." In recent years, the strategic partnership between India and the United States has continued to grow. In 2021, India and the United States signed the "US-India Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership," which aimed to deepen the bilateral relationship between the two countries even further.

India's Diplomatic Policy towards Economically Weak Countries

India has pursued a policy of engagement and cooperation with economically weak countries across the world, particularly in the African continent. India's engagement with these countries has been guided by the principle of “South-South cooperation”, which aims to foster economic development and promote mutual cooperation among developing countries. In 2008, India and Africa signed the "New Delhi Declaration," which aimed to deepen the economic and strategic relationship between India and Africa.

India has also established several capacity-building programs in African countries, aimed at promoting human resource development and strengthening institutional capacity. These programs have included the Pan African e-Network project, which aimed to provide telemedicine and tele-education services to African countries, and the India-Africa Forum Summit 2015, which aimed to deepen the relationship between India and African nations in areas such as trade, investment, and technology.

In addition, India has also pursued a policy of engagement with Latin America, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Islands for establishing several economic and strategic partnerships with countries of these regions, including the India-CARICOM Joint Commission in 2009, which aimed to deepen the economic and strategic relationship between India and Caribbean nations; and has established several capacity-building programs in these countries, aimed at promoting human resource development and strengthening institutional capacity. These programs have included the establishment of centres of excellence in various sectors, including information technology, agriculture, and pharmaceuticals. India’s relationship with the Pacific Island nations has deepened with the establishment of the FIPIC in 2015. The recent meeting between Prime Minister Modi and the leaders of the India-Pacific Islands Developing States (PSIDS) at New York (2019) focused on the view towards building close partnership with the Pacific Island nations and work closely to advance mutually beneficial developmental goals. 

Moving forward, India's diplomatic policy will need to be guided by a mix of economic, political, and social factors. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, it is more important than ever for nations to work together to address common challenges and pursue shared goals. India's diplomatic policy will need to reflect this reality and aim to deepen the relationship between India and other nations across the world.

This brings us to the importance of the G20 forum where India is a member and has been elected to hold the Presidency of the G20 in this year 2023. The G20 group of countries, also known as the Group of Twenty, is an international forum that brings together the world's leading developed and emerging economies to discuss global economic and financial issues. The G20 consists of 19 countries and the European Union, representing around 85% of global GDP and two-thirds of the world's population.

Importance of the G20

The G20 has emerged as a key platform for international cooperation on global economic issues, providing a forum for countries to discuss and coordinate policies that can promote sustainable and inclusive growth, create jobs, and reduce poverty. The G20 has become increasingly important in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, which highlighted the need for greater international coordination and cooperation to address global economic challenges.

It plays an important role in promoting international trade and investment, ensuring financial stability, and addressing global issues such as climate change, inequality, and social inclusion. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, the G20's role in promoting global economic cooperation and ensuring economic stability has become even more crucial.

Agenda of the G20

The G20 agenda is focused on promoting sustainable and inclusive growth, creating jobs, and reducing poverty, while being committed to promoting open and fair trade, and to ensuring that the benefits of economic growth are shared by all members of society. The G20 agenda is guided by a number of principles, including the importance of cooperation and coordination, the need for inclusive and sustainable growth, and the importance of promoting economic stability and financial reform, across the world.

Policies of the G20

The G20 has implemented a number of policies which include efforts to promote investment in infrastructure, to increase access to finance for small and medium-sized enterprises, and to promote the development of skills and education. It has also implemented policies to promote open and fair trade, including efforts to reduce trade barriers and to promote the development of regional and global trade agreements. It has worked to address issues related to global financial stability, including efforts to improve the regulation and supervision of financial institutions, and to promote transparency and accountability in financial markets, and has played an important role in promoting the Paris Agreement on climate change, and in supporting efforts to promote sustainable development and reduce inequality.

The presidency of the G20 is transferred from country to country on an annual basis to ensure that the organization remains inclusive, representative, and responsive to the changing needs and priorities of its members. By rotating the presidency, different regions and countries have the opportunity to lead the organization and bring their unique perspectives and priorities to the table. This helps to promote continuity and stability, while also ensuring that different countries have the opportunity to shape the agenda and priorities of the G20. This ensures that the organization's decision-making processes are more visible and transparent and helps to promote public trust in the organization and ensures that its policies and priorities are aligned with the needs and interests of its members.

During the 2016 G20 summit, which was hosted by China, the focus was on promoting innovation and sustainability, and the launch of initiatives such as the Green Finance Study Group and the Global Infrastructure Connectivity Alliance, while Japan's presidency in 2019, was focused on promoting innovation and digitalization; with the aim to “realize and promote a free and open, inclusive and sustainable, human-centered future society” and recognize the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals as being at the core of the development agenda and other global issues. 

The 2020 G20 summit, hosted by Saudi Arabia, focused on promoting global cooperation to address the COVID-19 pandemic and its economic impacts, and launched initiatives such as the Access to COVID-19 Tools (ACT) Accelerator and the Debt Service Suspension Initiative (DSSI). These initiatives helped to promote international cooperation and solidarity in the face of a global crisis, reflecting the unique priorities and leadership of Saudi Arabia as the host country.

India, as the host of the G20 summit in 2023 is focused on promoting the universal sense of one-ness, via the theme 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'. Essentially, this affirms the value of all life; human, animal, plant, and microorganisms, and their interconnectedness on the planet Earth and in the wider universe. The theme also spotlights LiFE (Lifestyle for Environment), with its associated, environmentally sustainable and responsible choices, both at the level of individual lifestyles as well as national development, leading to globally transformative actions resulting in a cleaner, greener and bluer future.

The period from the 1980s to the present day has seen significant changes in the international relationships between countries across the world. The emergence of Asia as a major economic and military power, and the rise of China as a global competitor to the United States, have led to complex and evolving relationships between these regions.

India's diplomatic policy towards China, Europe, the United States, and economically weak countries between 1995 to 2021 has been marked by several successes and challenges. While India has developed strong partnerships with several countries across the world, it has also faced several challenges, particularly in the areas of border disputes and trade negotiations.

India’s soft diplomacy is reflected in its international relationships. Its vision is optimistic and is based on the principles of non-violence, largely pluralistic governance and a non-threatening global leadership. The legacy of India’s culture, history and ancient philosophy has shown the world that India is a largely harmonious nation that has assimilated various different religions and ethnicities over the centuries, and has never forgotten its own culture and the philosophy of peace, and has been a stalwart champion of inter-civilizational and inter-cultural exchanges.

The current government has created innovative ideas by blending traditional soft-power elements of dialogue and mutual agreements, with the inclusiveness of the Indian diaspora in its diplomatic efforts, the global promotion of Yoga, and initiatives such as ‘Destination India’ and ‘Know India’ in advancing the nation’s national interests.

Since 2014, the Indian government under the leadership of our Prime Minister Narendra Modi has invested substantial resources to enhance India’s diplomatic capabilities. Embassies across the world have been increased, and higher levels of interactions with regional organizations like ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Nations), SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) and BIMSTEC (Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation), has intensified cultural, economic, and diplomatic relationships with its Eastern and South Asian neighbors through the Look–East Policy, the Act–East Policy, and the Neighborhood First Policy, all of which are focused on fostering stronger international ties which would translate into commercial and strategic benefits for India.

“There are three trips you take to India: the one you think you’re going to have; the one you actually have; and the one you live through once you go back home”.

References:

1.      "The End of the Cold War and the United States: Implications for Asia-Pacific Security," by Michael J. Green (International Security, Vol. 14, No. 4, Spring 1990).

2.      "The Rise of China and Its Implications for Asia," by Kishore Mahbubani (The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, Summer 2004).

3.      "The US 'Pivot to Asia' and China's Response," by Yun Sun (The Pacific Review, Vol. 27, No. 5, December 2014).

4.      "India's Economic Reforms: A Brief History and Some Lessons," by Arvind Panagariya (Columbia University Academic Commons, 2003).

5.      "Europe's Refugee Crisis: Assessing the Factors that Contributed to the Unfolding of the Humanitarian Catastrophe," by Ana L. Revenga and Maria Luengo-Prado (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 7815, October 2016).

6.      "The COVID-19 Pandemic and Global Trade: Systemic Implications of Supply Chain Resilience," by Richard Baldwin and Simon Evenett (Centre for Economic Policy Research, March 2020).

  1. India's Diplomatic Policy towards Economically Weak Countries:"New Delhi Declaration" signed by India and Africa: Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. (2008, April 8). India-Africa Forum Summit: New Delhi Declaration. https://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/30528/IndiaAfrica+Forum+Summit+New+Delhi+Declaration
  2. Pan African e-Network project: Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. (n.d.). Pan African e-Network Project. https://www.mea.gov.in/Portal/ForeignRelation/Pan_African_e-Network_Project.pdf
  3. India-Africa Forum Summit 2015: Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. (2015, October 29). India-Africa Forum Summit 2015: Outcomes and Deliverables. https://www.mea.gov.in/press-releases.htm?dtl/26036/IndiaAfrica+Forum+Summit+2015+Outcomes+and+Deliverables
  4. India-CARICOM Joint Commission: Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. (2009, May 1). India-CARICOM Joint Commission. https://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/3987/IndiaCARICOM+Joint+Commission
  5. FIPIC: Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. (2015, August 14). First India-Pacific Islands Summit: Outcome Document. https://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/25637/First+IndiaPacific+Islands+Summit+Outcome+Document
  6. G20:
    1. Official website of the G20: https://g20.org/
    2. G20 Principles for Cooperation: G20 Research Group. (2017). G20 Principles for Cooperation. http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/analysis/cooperation.html
    3. G20 Infrastructure Agenda: G20 Research Group. (2016). G20 Infrastructure Agenda. http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/analysis/infrastructure.html
    4. G20 Trade and Investment Agenda: G20 Research Group. (2016). G20 Trade and Investment Agenda. http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/analysis/trade.html
    5. G20 Financial Regulation and Supervision Agenda: G20 Research Group. (2016). G20 Financial Regulation and Supervision Agenda. http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/analysis/financial.html
    6. G20 Green Finance Study Group: G20 Research Group. (2016). G20 Green Finance Study Group. http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/analysis/greenfinance.html
    7. G20 Global Infrastructure Connectivity Alliance: G20 Research Group. (2016). G20 Global Infrastructure Connectivity Alliance. http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/analysis/connectivity.html
    8. G20 Innovation and Digitalization Agenda: G20 Japan 2019. (n.d.). Innovation and Digitalization. https://www.japan.go.jp/g20japan/agenda/innovation_digitalization.html
    9. G20 Sustainable Development Agenda: G20 Japan 2019. (n.d.). Sustainable Development. https://www.japan.go.jp/g20japan/agenda/sustainable_development.html
    10. G20 Saudi Arabia 2020: G20 Saudi Arabia. (n.d.). G20 Saudi Arabia 2020. https://g20.org/en/g20/Documents/Communique_EN%20(2).pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Taliban of the 21st century

Taliban of the 21st century 

The Taliban’s agility and ability to adapt has been remarkable. Their gradual acceptance to of the fact that unrestricted violence would hurt their quest for popular support, transformed into sophisticated policy planning and implementation of developmental activities. Step -by -step, they revived and re-started parts of their governance, and invented other systems through trial and error. Much of this process appears to be from the ground-up and influenced by popular demand and local experiences. Their leadership also proceeded to correct many of the flaws and shortcomings that undermined their rule in the 1990s. The ban on women and girls attending school has been removed, though most Taliban officials claim that no ban ever existed, and have publicly stated that women should have access to education. The ban on opium cultivation and its trade, which was a disaster during their earlier government times is clearly no longer in place, but the Taliban do not publicizeise this shift in policy and down-play the opium connection in public. Other subtle differences are their stated respect for other ethnic groups and their embrace of technology, limited as it may be. Circumstances have radically changed for the Taliban since 2001, and their policies and goals have shifted accordingly. Far from being a revolutionary movement of the 1990s, prior to 2022, they considered themselves as a deposed government and the main armed opposition fighting the pro-Western government supported by foreign soldiers. The Taliban leadership itself has also been transformed. Circumstances have forced them to travel outside their villages and also outside the country at times, and they have learned from their travels.

The simple fighters of yester-years are worldly trained politicians today,; transforming themselves from being traditional conservatives into modern Islamists. They have also become better at managing external perceptions, having realised that appearing as educated people is an advantage and it is helpful in manipulating the media. They have become sophisticated; with professional-standard glossy publications, a website in several languages, videos made of high-quality production and highly capable spokesmen that respond rapidly to questions and criticism across social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook and WhatsApp; even though what is publicized on the social media is vastly different from the ground reality in Afghanistan. What exactly do the changes in Taliban policy means for Afghans and the future of Afghanistan will depend on the critical study and analysis of their on-ground actions. The Taliban are led by the Emir ul-Mumenin (leader of the faithful), currently Mullah Haibatullah Akhunzada. The scope and complexity of this position varies according to the person who occupies it, and the current Emir’s functions are more spiritual and political, than as an operational military commander. He is assisted by two deputies, as well as the leadership shura. At the provincial level, there is a governor, appointed officially by the leadership shura. The Taliban now has a quasi-professional core of individuals who have served for several years across multiple provinces. These governors and local councils / commissions are not completely ‘civilian’, and the governors may serve in a military capacity to varying degrees depending on the context and broader requirements of the office for local governance. Provincial ministers are appointed by the leadership of the relevant council, viz,: education, health and finance; in consultation with the governor of the province. The system has grown more comprehensive over the years, with a dozen committees, some with multiple departments covering a multitude of issues. Significant autonomy is granted to province and district- level officials within the overall framework of the policy.

This flexibility is intentional, in order to accommodate different views and reduce dissent to as little as possible. It also helps to prevent the Taliban from splitting into different factions; since local politics and preferences based on history play a significant role in governance. Some areas might have a higher demand for health services than others, while others might want to give priority to education. The extent to which services have been available in the past also matters.  Areas where customary structures of governance are influential and respected, are in a stronger position to bargain for amenities from the Taliban officials. Individual relationships also influence policies, although the Taliban does not generally welcome individual opinions, since such interactions could be perceived as corruption.  In practice however, the Taliban rely on relationships in every aspect of their governance, due to a lack of trust in general and the widespread suspicion of their motives by the locals and the international interlocutors. Arrangements between the Taliban and civilians are based on a mutual yet unequal exchange, leading to an informal social contract that renders to the Taliban a legitimate authority, and strengthening its credibility as an acceptable form of government; even though it is not a government- based on the choice and free will of the people of Afghanistan.

The Taliban’s agility and ability to adapt has been remarkable. Their gradual acceptance of the fact that unrestricted violence would hurt their quest for popular support, transformed into sophisticated policy planning and implementation of developmental activities. Step -by -step, they revived and re-started parts of their governance, and invented other systems through trial and error. Much of this process appears to be from the ground-up and influenced by popular demand and local experiences. Their leadership also proceeded to correct many of the flaws and shortcomings that undermined their rule in the 1990s. The ban on women and girls attending school has been removed, though most Taliban officials claim that no ban ever existed, and have publicly stated that women should have access to education. The ban on opium cultivation and its trade, which was a disaster during their earlier government times is clearly no longer in place, but the Taliban do not publicize this shift in policy and down-play the opium connection in public. Other subtle differences are their stated respect for other ethnic groups and their embrace of technology, limited as it may be. Circumstances have radically changed for the Taliban since 2001, and their policies and goals have shifted accordingly. Far from being a revolutionary movement of the 1990s, prior to 2022, they considered themselves as a deposed government and the main armed opposition fighting the pro-Western government supported by foreign soldiers. The Taliban leadership itself has also been transformed. Circumstances have forced them to travel outside their villages and also outside the country at times, and they have learned from their travels. 

The Taliban in 2024

Many analysts are of the opinion that the Taliban of 2021 are is different from the earlier Taliban of 2001. While the new leaders are still committed to their traditional ideology, they have learnt new tactics for interactions with the rest of the world, especially the non-Islamic countries. Even today, the command-and-control structure is controlled by the ‘Rahbri Shoora’ (Grand Council of Leadership), and most of its members are veterans of the resistance that battled the Western armies and the Afghan government forces sponsored by the U.S. and NATO. The Supreme leader of the Taliban, Mullah Haibatullah Akhundzada is the ultimate authority on religious, political and military affairs; and is assisted in his decisions by Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, a founding member of the modern Taliban who looks after the political branch, Mullah Yaqoob (son of Mullah Omar) who heads the military branch, and Sirajuddin Haqqani (son of guerrilla commander Maulvi Jalaluddin Haqqani) who looks after eastern Afghanistan. Non-Pashtuns were a part of the Taliban in the 1990s, but now the Tajiks, Uzbeks, Hazaras and Turkmens have made deep inroads into the Taliban hierarchy. The Tajik leader Qari Deen Muhammed is a member of the Supreme Council while fellow Tajik Qari Fasihudin is the Chief of the General Staff of the armed forces, and Uzbek leader Abdul Salam Hanfi from Faryab is the acting second deputy Prime Minister in the Taliban government.

The Western countries constantly hope for democracy in Afghanistan. However, this is almost an impossibility in an organization like the Taliban who are dedicated to the hardline interpretation of Islamic values. While the Taliban are flexible in the inclusion of ethnic minorities in their government, their views towards women’s empowerment has not changed and women are still denied basic rights to obtain an education or employment. With the passage of time since coming to power, the Taliban have realized that while one generation defeated the Soviet Union and the latest generation defeated the combined forces of the USA and NATO,; administration of a complex country like Afghanistan is extremely difficult. They need international support to assist the people of their country with their basic human needs, and this cannot be achieved through isolation from the world.

Since coming to power, the Taliban has imposed a harsh interpretation of Islamic law in the country, ignoring their earlier pledges to respect the rights of women, and religious and ethnic minority communities. Since regaining control, their actions are reminiscent of their earlier brutal rule of the 1990s, where they are struggling to provide the people of Afghanistan with adequate food supplies and other basic needs. Within a period of just 16 months of forming the government, numerous human rights violations have been recorded against them by the UN mission in Afghanistan. Intimidation of journalists, restriction of freedom of expression, regular suppression of demonstrations and forced disappearance of those who protest against their governance are a regular feature of the Taliban governance. They have re-established the ‘Ministry for the Propagation of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ to implement Islamic law as defined by the Taliban. Restrictions against women and girls have risen and their access to employment, education, public interactions and other fundamental rights such as access to justice, have been heavily curtailed. Flogging of women for ‘moral crimes,, physical torture of women’s rights activists, banning them from public parks, limiting their visits to the markets (compulsorily accompanied by a male relative as a chaperone) and requiring women to cover their faces in public,; are contributing to women being erased from public life. According to Mahbouba Seraj, a women’s rights activist, the women of Afghanistan went from being part of the society, being doctors, judges, engineers and officials, to nothing under the Taliban rule. "Even the most basic right, the Right to Education, has been taken away from them" she has stated.

The new power structure has wiped out the gains in the standard of living that were achieved over twenty years of the Western powers’ presence in Afghanistan, with almost all of the population now living in poverty. Most of the people are suffering from some form of food insecurity and the situation is becoming more critical with the stoppage of foreign aid. Violence remains wide-spread with the increased attacks of Taliban by members of the Islamic State of Khorasan, that add to the public suffering. There is a rising concern among international observers that the Taliban’s support to al-Qaeda will pose a continued threat to regional and international security. Despite the Taliban’s publicly stated policy that they will not allow Afghanistan to be used as a base for global terrorism, their policy of offering safe haven and increased freedom to the al-Qaeda has not changed. The United Nation’s April 2024 report states that “al-Qaeda is likely using Afghanistan as a friendly environment to recruit, train and fund raise,, and is suspected to be re-establishing a strong presence in Afghanistan. 



Evolving International Relationships of India since the 1980's

Introduction In this article, we will look at International Relationships across the world from the 1980s to date, with specific focus on ...