Why the Western Nations are Against the Idea of a Rising Bharat

Fascists! Neo-Nazis! Patriots in Bharat (known to the world as India) are being labeled and branded by the so-called intellectuals of the western world as the ‘next danger to global peace’; while in reality, they have not even understood the issue that they are criticizing through the medium of innuendo and outright false-hood.

The very definition of politics as left-wing, centralist, right-wing, etc.; is very much a narrow western concept that is unable to cover the socio-political nuances of the oldest civilization of the world. Western politics has always been defined through the lens of religion. Almost all Western countries have their democracies formulated on the basis of religious tenets, with Christianity being the bedrock of all their values. Being cultureless since their very existence, the Westerners are unable to reconcile the Bharatiya (Indian) concept of political thought, where patriotism is the spark that drives all social behavior. The west, due to its very narrow ideas of translation, equate the word Dharma to religion; not understanding that the very idea of Dharma is much larger than their capability of perception and that Dharama encapsulates various other factors of responsibility, honor, pride, duty and empathy. To the westerners, each of these qualities are separate and co-exist; while in Bharatiya sanskriti (culture) they form an amalgamation of all into one, the Dharma. And, due to their inability to understand this complex, yet simple aspect of our culture, they pervert the definition of Bharatiya patriotism into something that should be unacceptable and a potential danger to the world.

So, let us correct the record for posterity. Bharatiya patriots are not fascists, neither are they neo-Nazis. They are simply people who are loyal to their Nation, and the values that define this nation; equality, freedom, and the right to merit-based success. It is the last value, the “right” to meritocracy, that defines the “right-wing” political forces of Bharat. The country known as India was ruled and destroyed by the Europeans for over 200 years, primarily by the British. Being a cunning, vicious and moral-less community of scavengers, they were able to establish their rule by force over most of the world; replacing the equally moral-less but less militarily powerful Islamic Mughal empires.  But they were never able to conquer the Nation of Bharat, the idea that defined the culture and identity of those who emerged from the land of Bharat. During the period of their conquest and rule, they introduced the concepts of communism and socialism, in addition to their ancient concept of imperialism. With the advent of technology, all concepts were strengthened by the forces of capitalism, and these narrow definitions are the root cause of all global conflict. Regardless of the political ‘isms’, countries and their societies are fighting for financial supremacy and are severely against any entity that poses a threat to their financial powers. 

And there-in lies their animosity towards Bharat. They are unable to understand, and unwilling to accept, that the residents of Bharat as fore-going the western values that were forced onto global societies during the age of imperialism, and returning to accept the ancient value systems that were prevalent before the Islamic and the British rule over India. The true, undisputed and ever-existing concepts are defined by the ‘Sanatan Dharma’, where sanatan means eternal and dharma means responsibility. In Bharat, the essence of being alive is defined and determined by the parameters of Sanatan Dharma. These parameters include patriotism, pride, self-determination and immersive religious activities. As the popularity of Sanatani religious activity has grown in Bharat, alarm bells have rung in the Vatican. This Church-based state used to control and dominate global politics and geo-political strategy. Being replaced by the Sanatan Dharma is unacceptable to the Church. Therefore, there is the concentrated and wide-spread effort to defile the name and nature of the forces of change that are being recognized and in many cases being accepted as an alternate to the Western value eco-system. The systematic attacks on the character of Bharatiya patriots comes in various forms, the most frequent being through the media. There is no doubt that Westerners are adept at the using the media in all its forms to define and drive global public opinion. Since every attack requires a target, the westerners are quick to focus their attacks on two entities; the Prime Minister of Bharat (India) Mr. Narendra Modi, and the Rashtriya Svyamsevak Sangh (RSS). The western media is quick to define the RSS as a “fascist para-military” organization; quite forgetting the fact that the very definition of fascist means ‘tyranny of an individual ultra-nationalist despot’, since the word itself was used to define Benito Mussolini, the dictator of Italy. It is said that words carry meanings. However, there is no clear acceptable definition of an ultra-nationalist. To describe somebody as a ‘nationalist’ is a complete definition in itself. A person is either a nationalist or not, there is no in-between or excess. In Bharat, just as in any other country, nationalists are people who strongly identifies with their own nation, vigorously support its interests to the exclusion of the interests of other nations. As the support for all the ideals of Bharat grows exponentially, it weakens the outside forces of the Church, the Western influencers and the radical Islamists. None of these want a Bharat that is powerful and impervious to their influences. As the people of Bharat exert upon their right to be truly independent, self-sufficient and self-reliant, the anti-Bharat forces use every strategy they can to halt this geo-political change. Their efforts to demean a person or an organization are bound to fail since the grass-root people identify and trust the person and the organization.

 

 

Emerging Khalistan: A Potential Danger to Free Societies and Western Countries

Emerging Khalistan: A Potential Danger to Free Societies and Western Countries

Over the past four years, the resurgence of the Khalistan movement, which is an idea that advocates for an independent Sikh state through the partition of the Republic of India, has gained unforeseen traction in certain Sikh diaspora communities across Western countries. While the movement itself is not new, its re-emergence in free societies like Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, and more recently in Australia and New Zealand poses political and social challenges that extend beyond its historical and regional roots. This raises critical questions about national security, social cohesion, and the abuse of democratic freedoms.

The Background of the Khalistan Movement

The Khalistan movement, seeking to establish a separate Sikh state originated in the Punjab region of India during the 20th century, especially the pre and post partition periods of 1947 when Greater India was partitioned by the British and their lackeys into Pakistan and India.

Although rooted in cultural and religious identity, the demand for Khalistan as a separate and independent state took a violent turn during the 1980s. The period was marked by militant uprisings, terrorism, the very foolish Operation Blue Star attack on the Golden Temple in 1984, and the subsequent political turmoil. While the Indian state quelled the violent insurgency by the 1990s, the idea of Khalistan persisted, largely among a segment of the Sikh diaspora, both in India as well as in foreign countries, specially the UK and Canada.

For decades, this movement remained a dormant ideological pursuit. However, with the advent of digital platforms and the growing influence of diaspora groups in Western democracies, Khalistan advocates have found new arenas to propagate their message, often framing it as a fight for "human rights" and "self-determination."

Khalistan proponents abuse the freedom of expression in Western countries to gain political traction. Western societies, with their strong protections for freedom of speech, assembly, and expression, have inadvertently provided fertile ground for Khalistan ideologues. These militant individuals often exploit these liberties to spread divisive narratives under the pretext of activism. The main reasons for the increased activities of these groups in the Western nations is due to Diaspora advocacy where second and third-generation Khalistan loving Sikh communities, removed from the realities of Punjab, have started to idealize the concept of Khalistan without fully understanding its historical and socio-political consequences. This advocacy is fuelled by digital propaganda where social media platforms amplify extremist narratives, often through disinformation and inflammatory rhetoric which leads to the exploitation of multiculturalism, where western countries' commitment to diversity and inclusion allows such groups to position themselves as representatives of Sikh identity, despite the fact that the majority of Sikhs worldwide reject Khalistan.

This gives rise to the potential dangers to free societies, and while western democracies pride themselves on safeguarding civil liberties, the misuse of these freedoms by radical elements are creating significant risks where the emergence of the current Khalistan movement’s activities poses potential dangers.

The Khalistan movement heavily relies on narratives that vilify Indian institutions and, by extension, certain ethnic or religious groups. This rhetoric can foster divisions within multicultural societies, as seen in violent clashes between pro-Khalistan supporters and other community members. The glorification of militancy also risks alienating moderate voices within the Sikh community, further polarizing the diaspora, and leading to the erosion of social cohesion.

The rise of Khalistan propaganda has been linked to incidents of violence and vandalism targeting Indian diplomatic missions and community centres, leading to National Security concerns. With verified reports of fundraising for extremist activities including support for militant organizations, and their connections to criminal activities like illicit drug trade and human trafficking, have highlighted the activities of these groups, to be conduits for terrorism and organized criminal activities. Intelligence agencies in India, as well as in the UK and Canada have raised concerns about individuals radicalized in western countries planning or supporting violent acts in India, and have strained international relations between countries, as can be seen in the current situation between Canada and India.

The misuse of democratic freedoms to promote a separatist agenda poses a paradox for free societies, and undermines democratic principles. While supporting human rights is a cornerstone of democracy, the allowing of unchecked hate speech, disinformation, and incitement for violence, are undermining the very values these societies uphold. The challenge lies in distinguishing between legitimate advocacy and extremist propaganda without eroding constitutional freedoms.

The unchecked activities of the Khalistan movement have had a negative effect in the Western countries. In 2023, tensions flared between the Indian and Canadian governments after allegations surfaced about foreign interference linked to pro-Khalistan activities. Vandalism at Hindu temples and calls for violence against Indian officials raised alarm about the growing radicalization in some Sikh diaspora segments in Canada. The Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has chosen to not only ignore these dangers to Canadian society, but has staked his political career on supporting the Khalistan movement. This has led to his drop-in popularity among the Canadian voters and has encouraged the Khalistan movement proponents to now start claiming that they are the rightful owners of Canada, and that the white people should go back to Europe and UK. Sounds hilarious, but it is not. With these outlandish claims, the leaders of the Khalistan movement are planting the seeds of a future revolt of their supporters against the elected Government of Canada.

In the United Kingdom, protests outside the Indian High Commission in London, that included the vandalism of the Indian flag, have highlighted the disruptive potential of Khalistan supporters in the UK. The British authorities have expressed concern over the movement's extremist agenda, but have failed to take any action. Maybe the UK politicians hope that the growing violent activities of the Khalistan will not affect their society. However, in reality, it will definitely bring about deep divisions in their society that will lead to increased violence on the streets of that country.

In the United States, the vandalism of the Indian consulate in San Francisco has sparked a debate about whether sufficient measures are in place to curb extremist activity in America. Law enforcement agencies there have warned of online radicalization efforts targeting younger members of the Sikh diaspora.

The recent activities by the leaders of the Khalistan movement in Australia and New Zealand, where they held a “referendum” of their supporters for creating a Khalistan state in India should have been an eye-opener for the governments of these countries. The public calls by the Khalistan leaders to “Kill Modi”, a call to assassinate the democratically elected Prime Minister of India, have not been prosecuted by the governments of Australia and New Zealand, which is a clear indication that these, mostly leftist–liberal governments, are encouraging and maybe even supporting the idea of Khalistan, in the hope to destabilize the nation of India.

It is crucial to emphasize that the Khalistan movement represents a fringe ideology and is rejected by the mainstream Sikh community. The vast majority of Sikhs worldwide, including those in Punjab and the diaspora, are proud Indians and value their cultural and spiritual identity within the framework of a unified India. Sikhism, a faith rooted in principles of equality, service, and communal harmony, is often misrepresented by extremist narratives that use religion as a tool for political agendas. Prominent Sikh leaders and organizations across the world have consistently distanced themselves from the Khalistan movement, highlighting its divisive nature. Moreover, the state of Punjab today enjoys peace and prosperity, a testament to the resilience of its people in overcoming the dark period of militancy.

Unless it is the political geopolitical agenda of the ‘Five Eye’ countries; the USA, the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand; to avoid any confrontation with the Khalistan movement and allow it to grow without any challenges in the hope that this will create obstacles for the economic growth of India, they will have to take strong steps to find a balance between protecting free speech and curbing the misuse of these freedoms by extremist elements. While free societies must uphold their commitment to civil liberties, they cannot afford to ignore the potential dangers posed by extremist ideologies that exploit these freedoms.

For their own protection, they will require to be vigilant, commit themselves to community engagement, and act strongly to protect democratic values and social harmony. Western democracies must ensure that their freedoms are not weaponized to propagate hate or disrupt peace within their own societies. The one realistic fact is that Khalistan will not be created in the country that is today the strong and vibrant nation called the Republic of India. However, if the countries of Canada, UK, Australia and New Zealand ignore the dangers posed by the Khalistan movement, their own countries will soon face civil war from these very terrorists. The USA, being a country of daily violence through its very nature of a society that freely carries firearms and is willing kill to protect its society, will not face too much danger from Khalistan proponents.