Fascists! Neo-Nazis! Patriots in Bharat (known to the world as India) are being labeled and branded by the so-called intellectuals of the western world as the ‘next danger to global peace’; while in reality, they have not even understood the issue that they are criticizing through the medium of innuendo and outright false-hood.
The very definition of politics as left-wing, centralist, right-wing, etc.; is very much a narrow western concept that is unable to cover the socio-political nuances of the oldest civilization of the world. Western politics has always been defined through the lens of religion. Almost all Western countries have their democracies formulated on the basis of religious tenets, with Christianity being the bedrock of all their values. Being cultureless since their very existence, the Westerners are unable to reconcile the Bharatiya (Indian) concept of political thought, where patriotism is the spark that drives all social behavior. The west, due to its very narrow ideas of translation, equate the word Dharma to religion; not understanding that the very idea of Dharma is much larger than their capability of perception and that Dharama encapsulates various other factors of responsibility, honor, pride, duty and empathy. To the westerners, each of these qualities are separate and co-exist; while in Bharatiya sanskriti (culture) they form an amalgamation of all into one, the Dharma. And, due to their inability to understand this complex, yet simple aspect of our culture, they pervert the definition of Bharatiya patriotism into something that should be unacceptable and a potential danger to the world.
So, let us correct the record for posterity. Bharatiya patriots are not fascists, neither are they neo-Nazis. They are simply people who are loyal to their Nation, and the values that define this nation; equality, freedom, and the right to merit-based success. It is the last value, the “right” to meritocracy, that defines the “right-wing” political forces of Bharat. The country known as India was ruled and destroyed by the Europeans for over 200 years, primarily by the British. Being a cunning, vicious and moral-less community of scavengers, they were able to establish their rule by force over most of the world; replacing the equally moral-less but less militarily powerful Islamic Mughal empires. But they were never able to conquer the Nation of Bharat, the idea that defined the culture and identity of those who emerged from the land of Bharat. During the period of their conquest and rule, they introduced the concepts of communism and socialism, in addition to their ancient concept of imperialism. With the advent of technology, all concepts were strengthened by the forces of capitalism, and these narrow definitions are the root cause of all global conflict. Regardless of the political ‘isms’, countries and their societies are fighting for financial supremacy and are severely against any entity that poses a threat to their financial powers.
And there-in lies
their animosity towards Bharat. They are unable to understand, and unwilling to
accept, that the residents of Bharat as fore-going the western values that were
forced onto global societies during the age of imperialism, and returning to
accept the ancient value systems that were prevalent before the Islamic and the
British rule over India. The true, undisputed and ever-existing concepts are
defined by the ‘Sanatan Dharma’, where sanatan means eternal and dharma means responsibility.
In Bharat, the essence of being alive is defined and determined by the
parameters of Sanatan Dharma. These parameters include patriotism, pride,
self-determination and immersive religious activities. As the popularity of
Sanatani religious activity has grown in Bharat, alarm bells have rung in the
Vatican. This Church-based state used to control and dominate global politics
and geo-political strategy. Being replaced by the Sanatan Dharma is
unacceptable to the Church. Therefore, there is the concentrated and wide-spread
effort to defile the name and nature of the forces of change that are being
recognized and in many cases being accepted as an alternate to the Western
value eco-system. The systematic attacks on the character of Bharatiya patriots
comes in various forms, the most frequent being through the media. There is no
doubt that Westerners are adept at the using the media in all its forms to
define and drive global public opinion. Since every attack requires a target,
the westerners are quick to focus their attacks on two entities; the Prime
Minister of Bharat (India) Mr. Narendra Modi, and the Rashtriya Svyamsevak
Sangh (RSS). The western media is quick to define the RSS as a “fascist
para-military” organization; quite forgetting the fact that the very definition
of fascist means ‘tyranny of an individual ultra-nationalist despot’, since the
word itself was used to define Benito Mussolini, the dictator of Italy. It is
said that words carry meanings. However, there is no clear acceptable
definition of an ultra-nationalist. To describe somebody as a ‘nationalist’ is
a complete definition in itself. A person is either a nationalist or not, there
is no in-between or excess. In Bharat, just as in any other country,
nationalists are people who strongly identifies with their own nation,
vigorously support its interests to the exclusion of the interests of other
nations. As the support for all the ideals of Bharat grows exponentially, it
weakens the outside forces of the Church, the Western influencers and the
radical Islamists. None of these want a Bharat that is powerful and impervious
to their influences. As the people of Bharat exert upon their right to be truly
independent, self-sufficient and self-reliant, the anti-Bharat forces use every
strategy they can to halt this geo-political change. Their efforts to demean a
person or an organization are bound to fail since the grass-root people
identify and trust the person and the organization.
